We keep the process streamlined and reliable: a brief clarification meeting, structured research with openly documented sources, clear evaluation, and a presentation of results with a decision template. You know where we stand at all times; the scope and deadlines are binding. If no meaningful scope emerges during the clarification meeting, we stop—at no cost.
We start with a brief discussion in which we establish three things:
– What decision needs to be made (and by when)?
– What options are realistic (A/B/C)?
– What risks would be deal breakers?
Result: Clear list of questions + scope of deliverables.
– Source verification (original source, date, context, interests)
– Cross-checking (at least one independent confirmation, where possible)
– Plausibility checks (contradictions, outliers, alternative explanations)
– Separation of facts / inferences / assumptions
Result: A report that stands up internally.
We deliver in a way that decision-makers can work with:
– Executive summary (1–2 pages)
– Key findings with source logic
– Options for action, including risks and prioritisation
– “What we would still examine” (if time/budget are limited)
Result: A basis for decision-making that you can use directly in the management team.
Meeting, Q&A, optional: support with bank/advisory board presentation.
• Less risk. Multiple checks with included fact-checking drastically reduce outliers and “hallucinations.”
• More speed. Parallelization saves days without sacrificing quality.
• Better discussions in the boardroom. Presentation-ready slides with sources, assumptions, and go/no-go reasoning.
• Scalable. Recurring questions (such as price radar, competitive moves) can be updated monthly.
Create a to-do list with facts
To ensure we can deliver quickly and accurately while keeping your effort to a minimum, we only need very little to get started:
Goal & success criteria (e.g., sales, margin, time, risk)
A contact person for queries (response within 24–48 hours)
Existing documents (product information, customer segments, assumptions)
General conditions (regions, languages, legal requirements)
Schedule & budget framework (for prioritization)
Good to know: If no reasonable scope emerges after the clarification meeting, we will stop—at no cost.
Scaffolding is a custom-built internal framework
It is essentially the special secret ingredient that controls and guides the LM/language models. This framework is newly developed for each case and adapted to the specific characteristics of the topic, the question and the desired type of results.
Majority voting = majority decision
Greater security through multiple checks.
Several models develop solutions independently.
We compare your receipts, weigh up quality and consistency, and go with the majority decision—any differing answers are looked into further.
Focus analysis 10–14 days, in-depth analysis 2–3 weeks.
Dual control principle.
A research lead checks sources, recalculates critical figures themselves, and flags traffic light risks (green/yellow/red).
Where necessary, we call in industry experts.
Everything documented.
Sources, timestamps, verification steps, and versions are linked in the report.
This makes results traceable and updatable.
Often yes (e.g., BAFA/innovation voucher). We check this in advance and assist with the application.
Key statements are documented with source references.
GDPR compliant; data processing agreement available on request.
German/English (others upon request).
We will re-negotiate the scope; additional/reduced costs will be transparent.
No. People make decisions.
AI speeds up research and variant creation; quality assurance is carried out by our team.
We only process project-related data, store sources and results in accordance with the GDPR, and use European infrastructure wherever possible.
Get smart. We collect the important data for your company and prepare it for you.
